As usual, when Polly St. George does her deep dive investigations, the details that she uncovers are so compelling. Many times after watching her podcasts I wonder why journalists aren’t doing this kind of investigative journalism. But then I come back to reality. The hacks that work for legacy media corporations are bought and paid for (captured) by the powers that be.
Real (investigative) journalists only exist on the sidelines, working independently. Thank God we have people who want to stay true and maintain real integrity. This is a rare thing these days. On that note I like to refer to the following meme (i.e. a quote from George Orwell):
Because of the amount of detail that Polly covers in the following video, I decided to provide detailed show notes below the video for your reference. I believe that this is a very important piece of work from Polly. Especially in light of the recent law suits against Bonnie Henry (public health official for British Columbia). In this video Polly goes through her findings on the emails that were received from an FOI request submitted by the Canadian Advocacy Centre & Advocacy BC.
Here are some references to the law suit against Bonnie Henry:
Update on the BC charter challenge argued by Rocco Galati, by Tanya Gaw
Here’s the actual emails that were received. I’ve included highlights in this pdf document that Polly is emphasizing in her video so that you can follow along and read for yourself:
Response_Package_HTH-2021-13807
Here’s the video: BOOM! Vaccine Mafia Emails Exposed!
Podcast Notes:
Part 1
3 Themes that seem to prevail throughout these emails:
- 1. Protecting the pharmaceutical products over the people.
- 2. Major and blatant conflicts of interest
- 3. Manipulation of information to keep the public in the dark
Ways the “Health Authorities” Defend Pharmaceutical Products over People
Tweets from Canadian Advocacy Centre & Advocacy BC
Note: The exact same scenario is happening in Ontario and, very likely, in other provinces. That is because these health officers are driven by the exact same overarching organization called: “The Brighton Collaboration”.
Here’s an overview of all the players and connections to external organizations, shown in the middle of the chart. The connections highlight the potential conflicts of interest.
Vaccine Roll Out began at about December of 2020 in British Columbia and BC put out the following package:
https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/covid-19/vaccine/plan
*** Important ***
– when I look at the link that Polly is referring to, the webpage looks quite different now than what Polly is showing on her screen. I had to go to https://web.archive.org/ to find a version that looks like what Polly is showing.
– if you’ve been researching for any length of time you might realize the governments have a nasty habit of deleting or changing information on their websites. So in the interest of preservation of data, here’s a PDF saved copy of the version that appears on Polly’s screen:
COVID-19 Immunization Plan – Province of British Columbia
B.C. COVID-19 vaccine rollout: When will you be able to get the vaccine?
Note: The contradictions (pointed out by Polly here) between the two links right above. The key point here is that this is the type of incompetence and mixed messaging that has been happening since day 1.
Looking at the response package (emails from the FOI request) – link above, one of the key types of redactions is S13 (Policy advice or recommendations). Some redactions are warranted because of personal information… by why policy or recommendations. This should be visible. Looks like they are trying to hide something important (i.e. something that the public might be very much against).
From here Polly gets right into the emails and the points that she brings up are shocking to say the least… let the video run from here and pay close attention to the dates and the focus on “coordinated messaging” rather than a focus on “public health and safety” … These people are more sickening than the so-called virus that they are trying to “supposedly” protect the public from.
Now, pay close attention to this woman “Monica Naus” and the blatant conflict of interest that Polly digs up (i.e. the organizations that she belongs to or affiliated with). Further into an email that Monica Naus is part of she the mentions the “Brighton definition”. Pay close attention to what Polly says about the Brighton Collaboration.. Brighton was dissolved and taken over by the World Health Organization then later taken by CEPI.. deep dive here.
These globalist organizations are the one determining what should be counted as an adverse event. MAJOR CONFLICT!! Polly mentions two other podcasts that she did which covers these organizations and massive conflicts of interest surround public health worldwide. Wolves in charge of the hen house.
Here are the two videos:
October 4, 2021 – PFIZER’S INSIDE MAN
September 28, 2021 – VACCINE ADVERSE EVENTS REPORTING RIGGED BY GATES, SCHWAB, PFIZER
Brighton Funding Partners – CEPI (saved as PDF, in case)
How corrupt is the BC CDC? Look at the following image that Polly presents:
Funders of the BC CDC (Very similar to the list of organizations that are involved with CEPI). Polly covered this in detail in the previous podcasts mentioned above but have a look at this little chart (DOTS CONNECTED, you don’t need to make this shit up, seriously):
From this point, Polly covers emails that show a lot of confusion about the reporting of adverse events. The following web page was used as a reference to make her points in conjunction with an email from Monika Naus who seems far more pre-occupied with protecting the vaccines than with people.
Government of Canada – Adverse Events Following Immunization (AEFI) Reporting Form
Another very problematic issue with the reporting system is that it only seems to work for the reporting of the older, more traditional types of vaccines, NOT MRNA shots. This renders the reporting system virtually useless.
Reference to the following news article: Mclean’s – The NACI problem and how to fix it (saved in case it is deleted). This article goes directly against the use of the AstraZeneca and then shortly after, the Johnson & Johnson shots. When you consider the major conflicts of interest between Monica Naus and Pfizer, you begin to see a win for the mRNA shots (i.e. they now get a much bigger market share).
SMALL BREAK IN THE VIDEO HERE
Part 2
National Advisory Committee on Immunization – Key Players!
The above image describes the source of “credible” vaccine information that NACI defers to. As you can see, this is nothing more than word games to side step the issues of safety and efficacy.
Also with CanCax is a special report that you can download on their website: Routine immunization services during the COVID-19 pandemic
Here’s the actual downloaded PDF report: Click Here (saved in case it gets deleted). What is the focus of this report? Check this out:
A little side note here (maybe watch this video after you’ve finished Polly’s video). This is very similar to a podcast that Del Bigtree (The Highwire) did titled: SHOCKING VACCINE ADMISSIONS FROM INSIDE THE WHO. The are talking about vaccine hesitancy and trying to find ways to increase demand and acceptance. This video was published on the Truther’s Portal quite a long time ago. It’s funny how you can start piecing together different sources over time to corroborate your beliefs and conclusions.
But here’s a chart from the CanVax (pdf report) mentioned above:
This is insidious stuff.
Now, in terms of incentives and conflicts of interest, here’s a wikipedia reference to one of the players at NACI, Caroline Quach Thanh. Check out the funding that she has received:
Note: She was involved in press conferences that helped to shut down the use of AstraZeneca and then shortly after, the Johnson & Johnson shots which left only Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines. Also, remember Dr. Martin’s explosive revelations about how Prime Minister Trudeau may be getting enormous kickbacks on the patented nano lipid particle technology used to deliver mRNA (enormous conflict of interest here). This was covered here at the Truther’s Portal under Dr. Martin’s page:
Dr. David E. Martin Drops Shocking COVID-19 News On Canadians! No wonder Trudeau is pushing the mRNA vaccines so hard and want 100% of Canadians injected with these experimental drugs.
More conflict of interest links:
In contrast to all these people (who don’t seem to care about people but rather the success of the drugs), here Polly speaks about Dr. Charles Hoffe, who has put his entire medical career on the line to raise serious concerns about the safety of these “experimental drugs”. Dr. Hoffe has been covered here at the Truther’s Portal here.
NOTE: Right off the bat Polly points out that, in this email, they did NOT redact Dr. Hoffe’s name like they did with most, if not all other emails. Why? Here’s the open letter that Dr. Hoffe submitted to B. Henry (posted here at the Truther’s Portal): Click Here.
Here’s the video that Polly referred to (re: Dr. Charles Hoffe, delivers a dose of reality you can’t afford to miss):
This open letter was submitted back in April of 2021. But just in case you think Dr. Hoffe was just flogging some conspiracy theory (i.e. regarding the fatality rate of Covid-19 which is no worse than the seasonal flu), Polly shows a small clip from an interview with Bill Gates himself confirming the very same thing (i.e. the VAX man himself, who is NOT a medical professional in any way).
The next slide shows emails between Monica Naus and Carol Fenton addressing Hoffe’s concerns and treating this more as a PR damage control issue rather than a serious concern about the safety of these drugs. Notice the reply by Carol Fenton where she says: “I am in the process of CRAFTING a response with our communications department to try and mitigate the harm“. Note: The harm that she is referring to is about the harm to public’s perception of the safety of the drug rather than the harm to the people. No concern at all for the people.
Here’s a media interview (excerpt) with Carol Fenton essentially in response to Dr. Hoffe’s concerns:
Now here’s another follow up email between Naus and Henry. Notice how Naus CAPITALIZED the word PHONE. Suggesting they are very concerned about controlling the messaging and trying the shut Dr. Hoffe up. This woman appears to be very controlling and intimidating.
So who is this Penny? Penny Ballem. The next slide shows some information about who this Penny is:
Now here’s where another glaring conflict of interest comes in with this Penny Ballem:
This article is sourced HERE (also saved)
Notice that Ballem is getting a sweet deal contract through her numbered corporation “Pendru Consulting” for work that she is already getting paid to do with Vancouver Coastal Health where she is the “Chair of the Board” at VCH. No conflict of interest here?
Vaccine Approvals = sweet deals and a lot more money for these compromised health officials.
At this point Polly says that she could go on in a lot more detail about the other emails but now she wanted to emphasize what Dr. Charles Hoffe has gone through for raising legitimate concerns about safety. So here we go:
Here’s the sourced TN article (also saved)
Polly shows a clip here from the video that Dr. Charles Hoffe is in (shown above on this news post). This is been covered in a fair amount of detail on the Truther’s Portal (i.e. with Dr. Hoffe and the D-Dimer test). But listen to what he says about what he did with his patients (i.e. a before and after snapshot from the D-Dimer test). About 52% of his patients who agreed to do the test where showing up with micro-clotting.
… and now he is being brought up on criminal charges by the BC College of Physicians and Surgeons.
Source link: Click Here (also saved)
In the video with Dr. Charles Hoffe, he mentions how his office got burned down by the fire in Lytton whereby he lost all of his data related to his research on the Covid shots. Polly did an entire podcast on the suspicious nature of that fire which she mentions here. Here’s the episode that she is referring to:
AMAZING POLLY – DID THE GLOBAL MAFIA BURN IT DOWN?
The following slides just show more emails:
These emails just go to show that these public health officials were very much aware that many adverse events were popping up. Their response, more or less, was to mitigate harmful perceptions of the vaccines and unleash a political spin campaign against any negative information. NOTHING to do with concern for public health and safety.
Here we see that they finally acknowledged one adverse event where a pay out was offered up – June 3 2022. Took a while to get there (notice date).
Sourced Link: Click Here (also saved)
Now look at the following and consider how many adverse events never got reported. Even these numbers look high as far back as March of 2021. This should have been enough to raise major concerns with safety.
… and now:
So what is 1% of 12 million doses? Is that acceptable?
So to recap, here’s an overview of the players and possible conflicts of interest:
Remember that it is the Brighton Collaboration that determines what is deemed to be an acceptable case of an adverse event. This is all tied up with pay offs and major profits for the pharmaceutical corporations.
CEPI Overview:
This is who is telling everyone around the world what counts as a case of an adverse event. The wolf watching the hen house.
But it gets better, check out this relationship:
Keep in mind that the Federal Government (i.e. the Liberal Party) is not in charge of health care in Canada. So it had to find a way to control all of this through the provinces. Therefore, it looks like they used the National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NAZI oops I meant NACI) which is headed by, you guessed it, Monica Naus.
Shelley Deeks is the Monica Naus in Ontario and is the one that advises Premier Doug Ford. The Federal government is also using and funding CanVax.
Here’s one of the participants in this group of public health officials who go an award:
All these people are protecting the products not the people.