A bit of reflection on the purpose of the Truther’s Portal (TP).

The original intent of the TP was to provide a centralized repository of information with a focus on providing “alternative” and “independent” perspectives related to the Covid-19 pandemic. These alternative perspectives drag us into a mire of reality that create an extreme level of discomfort and cognitive dissonance. The following two factors continue to challenge our thinking on this subject:

  1. The “WHAT”?
  2. The “WHY”?

The answers to these two questions are deeply influenced by mental programming and perceptions. It is amazing how two people can look at the same object and see two totally different things.

Over the past few months the TP has evolved from a primary focus on the pandemic itself (i.e. the what) to a broader focus on much deeper and more controversial subjects (i.e. the why).

Both questions are extremely challenging to discuss because we are often faced with deep psychological programming that blocks our ability to expand our thinking beyond our psychological boxes. Most people do not realize that they are trapped inside a box and this is what constrains them from discovering the truth about the world that really exists.

A few things have become crystal clear when discussing the pandemic. Here are some general statements that reflect the overall content of the TP. These statements will likely create anxiety or stress between people who do not see the pandemic in the same way:

#1. This is NOT a pandemic but, rather, a plandemic.

#2. When it comes to deep psychological programming, no amount of data or logic has any effect on those who have wholeheartedly chosen to believe the “official” narrative from both government officials and their government funded legacy corporate news outlets.

#3. These news outlets (mentioned above) are state propaganda, social engineering bullhorns that give government officials unfettered access to the general public. Unfettered in the sense that they are never challenged on their messaging when they appear on those news sources. You see, this statement alone, causes unbelievable friction for some people.

#4. A typical question from those who refuse to consider alternative news sources is:

How do you know your sources are true and why would they “officialdom” lie to us?

However, this is generally not a question but a statement that attempts to discredit anything that doesn’t fit their “official” narrative. This is often a knee jerk reaction to short circuit any meaningful discussion. It is almost a deliberate insult to one’s intelligence. There is also an element of fear of being wrong. Most people do not like to admit that they are wrong about something and, therefore, tend to dig their heels in deeper. This is typical human psychology at play here.

There is also a degree of naivety and contradiction embedded in this knee jerk reaction. Naivety in the sense that government officials are always honest and care about us, without question. Contradiction in the sense that, if one is willing to challenge the alternatives, why wouldn’t they also challenge the official sources.

At least be consistent across the board. That would be more honest and engaging. But, to quickly dismiss alternative views, is to completely shut down one’s ability to think critically. There is no discipline or time invested to do good research in order to provide any meaningful argument.

Perhaps the most appropriate and easiest answer to the above question is:

How do you know your sources (i.e. legacy media) are true?

No one can be or should be completely certain. This is a very important point because this is the essence of growth. We must be willing to drop our egos and current beliefs in order to achieve discovery. We must open our minds to possible alternatives. This is the essence of true science and the main reason for breakthrough discoveries that have propelled humanity to advance.

#5. The government does not want us to think for ourselves.

This is dangerous to their agenda. Their agenda (globalism and the great reset) is dependent on ignorance and complacency. Again, this statement like the one above (re: state propaganda, social engineering bullhorns) also causes unbelievable friction for some people. The idea that there is a grand plan to implement a one world, tyrannical government is unfathomable for some. Why would they want to oppress or harm us? This is extremely naive.

#6. Due to a mass awakening over the past year (2021), we are seeing a shift from “government funded legacy corporate news outlets” to the “alternative and independent” information providers. For quite sometime, in the past, the former was generally referred to as “mainstream media”. But it is becoming far less accurate to call those news outlets mainstream. It has become quite clear that the latter of the two sources is perhaps now mainstream itself. For example, the Joe Rogan Experience podcast has a far greater number of viewers than CNN.

#7. The government appears to be loosing control of the narrative because of this mass migration from the “official” news to the “independent or alternative” news. This is very likely why we are seeing the government becoming unhinged. This is becoming very apparent by their reactions. For example, here in Canada, the Liberal Party is trying very hard to pass two bills that would give them the power to censor and punish anyone that is expressing any dissenting/opposing views. Does this sound like a government that is promoting democracy and freedom? Or, does this sound like a government that want totalitarian power and control? This is a very dangerous territory that we are getting into here.

#8. In continuation of the previous point, any judgment of what is acceptable speech or journalism is highly subjective. Who should make these determinations and based on what? By consenting to government oversight and judgment, we are subjecting ourselves to a higher power that could display no boundaries in their judgments. We would be entering into an Orwellian state (i.e. The MINISTRY OF TRUTH). This is dangerous.

#9. If we claim to be driven by the science then why are certain doctors/scientists, who do not subscribe to the “official” narrative, being completely dismissed ? After all, isn’t it essential that scientific community always question the science in order to be truly “scientific” ? Truly science is generally never settled. Things that were deemed to be true in the past have been proven to be either wrong or not complete. Why would we oppose, censor, deplatform, and threaten medical professionals who are raising serious concerns about any or all of the C-19 measures, especially concerns about the experimental mRNA drugs. This should be a red flag for everyone. Have we seen any government appointed health officials engage in meaningful discussions or debates with other medical professionals who do not agree?

Based on the previous statements, this is why the primary focus of the TP has shifted, to a much greater extent, on the “WHY” question. Most of the information being posted on the TP these days has little or nothing to do with the pandemic any more. That’s because the pandemic really had nothing to do with fighting a virus or concern about public health. It should be apparent now, for those who have taken the time to do good research, that the pandemic was always about POWER & CONTROL in the hands of the few.

The more you dig into the science, related to the pandemic, the more you get into discussions about:

  • geopolitics
  • global organizations such as the World Economic Forum and the United Nations and its subsidiaries (e.g. the WHO)
  • fake news
  • institutions such as the Central Banking system and its inevitable collapse

All of these things, combined, help to form the perception of what is very often referred to as the “DEEP STATE” and hidden agendas.

Throughout this article, the government has been identified as the source of the issues being discussed. However, if you are awake to the truth about the power structures of our world, you would likely come to the conclusion that our governments are merely just puppet sub-regimes that are controlled by higher “unelected” authorities. Which begs the following questions:

  • Does democracy actually exist at all?
  • Does the act of voting mean anything anymore? Did it ever?

This sounds like a very cynical view. But, if we’re being completely honest and realistic, is this cynicism misplaced?

Perhaps, even more to the point, are we just spewing baseless conspiracy theories about the deep state and its agendas? This term is the most sensitive and dismissive label that can be placed on anyone who questions the “official” narrative. Shouldn’t we always question authority, just scientists should always question the science? The act of questioning authority is highly threatening to the authoritarians but it should be our civic duty to do so.

To provide some clarity, let’s re-frame the current structure of the Truther’s Portal. The bulk of the new information that has been submitted to the TP over the past two months (January, February 2022) has been in the form of News posts. Many of these news posts have little or nothing to do with the pandemic itself, and rightly so.

The portal can be split into two major categories:

  1. Core Information Pages
  • The core information pages are intended to be foundational and cover three key subjects:
    • The Pandemic
    • The ”Why”
    • Human Rights
  1. News Posts and specific articles published by the author of the Truther’s Portal – There are now many news posts on the Portal and these can viewed as addendums to the Core Information Pages (item 1 above).

Let’s break things down just a little more to help you navigate the Portal more effectively. Within the three Core Information Pages (as mentioned above) we have the following:

The Pandemic is covered under the following pages:

The “Why” is covered under the following pages:

Human Rights

If you are new to researching alternative/independent sources of information, it is highly recommended that you take the time to go through the Foundational Information pages (outlined above) first.

You are not being told or asked to agree with this information but, rather, allow yourself to receive this information in order to properly and thoroughly evaluate a wide variety of sources. In other words, you are being asked recognize and properly evaluate different perspectives.

But this does require an investment in your time. If you are not willing to invest the time, then you can not be relevant to the discussion. At the very least, you should recognize this one point alone (i.e. relevance).

How important is it to invest the time?

Well, think of it this way, your knowledge or ignorance is what either props up or diminishes tyrannical power. Tyranny only happens through our compliance or acquiescence because of ignorance or, much worse than that, willful ignorance.

“Willful ignorance in the presence of knowledge is the measure of a bad person.”

– Mark Passio

“Fascists NEVER impose fascism because they can’t. There’s not enough of them. Fascism (or any form of tyranny) is always imposed by the population acquiescing to them.”

– David Icke

Shift In Direction (Fully Expected)